<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of salary and commission paid to directors for assessment year 1999-2000, based on turnover ratio between sister concern and assessee company. The disallowance was deemed justified as directors provided services to both entities, and payment allocation was proportionate. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeal, citing the intention to reduce taxable income and the directors&#039; dual roles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 325 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of salary and commission paid to directors for assessment year 1999-2000, based on turnover ratio between sister concern and assessee company. The disallowance was deemed justified as directors provided services to both entities, and payment allocation was proportionate. The Tribunal found no fault in the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the appeal, citing the intention to reduce taxable income and the directors&#039; dual roles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>