<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 323 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248419</link>
    <description>Mere issuance of a hearing notice under Rule 19 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 does not amount to admission of an appeal. Where the appellant fails to appear on the appointed date, the appeal may be treated as defective and unadmitted, consistent with the principle applied in Multiplan. The Tribunal noted that the assessee may still move an application explaining the non-appearance, but persistent absence can justify disposal as unadmitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 323 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248419</link>
      <description>Mere issuance of a hearing notice under Rule 19 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 does not amount to admission of an appeal. Where the appellant fails to appear on the appointed date, the appeal may be treated as defective and unadmitted, consistent with the principle applied in Multiplan. The Tribunal noted that the assessee may still move an application explaining the non-appearance, but persistent absence can justify disposal as unadmitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>