<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 322 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248418</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the denial of exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on long term capital gains from the sale of shares was successful. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the communication of objections and lack of clarity in the assessment, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The decision was set aside, and the case was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and compliance with legal procedures. The appellant&#039;s right to be heard was upheld, and the assessing officer was directed to address the observations made by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 322 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248418</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal against the denial of exemption under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on long term capital gains from the sale of shares was successful. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the communication of objections and lack of clarity in the assessment, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The decision was set aside, and the case was remanded to the assessing officer for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and compliance with legal procedures. The appellant&#039;s right to be heard was upheld, and the assessing officer was directed to address the observations made by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>