<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proportionate reversal of credit</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106896</link>
    <description>Proportionate reversal of cenvat credit under sub rule 3A of Rule 6 requires determining the credit attributable to inputs used for exempt goods. The debate is whether to apportion reversal by quantity of products or by value/turnover; input services contain a clear value based formula, and where the Rule bases calculations on value of final products and inputs, a taxpayer should not adopt a quantity basis solely because it is advantageous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proportionate reversal of credit</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106896</link>
      <description>Proportionate reversal of cenvat credit under sub rule 3A of Rule 6 requires determining the credit attributable to inputs used for exempt goods. The debate is whether to apportion reversal by quantity of products or by value/turnover; input services contain a clear value based formula, and where the Rule bases calculations on value of final products and inputs, a taxpayer should not adopt a quantity basis solely because it is advantageous.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>