<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the specific items of work mentioned in the show cause notice were not subject to Service Tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal and stay application were granted without the necessity of a pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 310 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the specific items of work mentioned in the show cause notice were not subject to Service Tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal and stay application were granted without the necessity of a pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>