<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 299 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248395</link>
    <description>Confessional statements, corroborative witness evidence, fabricated invoices and test reports may establish clandestine import on a prudent probability standard, shifting the onus to the importer. Smuggled goods cannot be assessed as bona fide passenger baggage under CTH 9803; they must be classified according to their true nature and duty re-determined on that basis. Where smuggling is proved only for identified consignments, duty recovery is confined to those goods and cannot extend to unproved items. A penalty for abetment under Section 112(b) requires proof of knowledge of smuggling and a legally sustainable confiscation basis; absent those ingredients, penalty is not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 299 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248395</link>
      <description>Confessional statements, corroborative witness evidence, fabricated invoices and test reports may establish clandestine import on a prudent probability standard, shifting the onus to the importer. Smuggled goods cannot be assessed as bona fide passenger baggage under CTH 9803; they must be classified according to their true nature and duty re-determined on that basis. Where smuggling is proved only for identified consignments, duty recovery is confined to those goods and cannot extend to unproved items. A penalty for abetment under Section 112(b) requires proof of knowledge of smuggling and a legally sustainable confiscation basis; absent those ingredients, penalty is not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>