<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 297 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248393</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the rectification of the assessment order under Section 154 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Assessing Authority must pass a rectification order within six months from the receipt of the application, as clarified by Circular No.14/2001 by the CBDT. The court emphasized that the appellant was not entitled to relief under Section 80HHD due to factual findings and the binding nature of the circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 297 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248393</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the rectification of the assessment order under Section 154 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Assessing Authority must pass a rectification order within six months from the receipt of the application, as clarified by Circular No.14/2001 by the CBDT. The court emphasized that the appellant was not entitled to relief under Section 80HHD due to factual findings and the binding nature of the circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>