<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248380</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals filed by the Department, upholding the decisions of the CIT (A) regarding the addition of cash deposits as undisclosed income and the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The CIT (A) reduced the undisclosed income amount, considering legitimate business transactions and supporting evidence provided by the assessee, leading to the penalty deletion based on the revised undisclosed income amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:19:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 284 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248380</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals filed by the Department, upholding the decisions of the CIT (A) regarding the addition of cash deposits as undisclosed income and the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The CIT (A) reduced the undisclosed income amount, considering legitimate business transactions and supporting evidence provided by the assessee, leading to the penalty deletion based on the revised undisclosed income amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>