<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 277 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The appellant&#039;s contention for CENVAT Credit on repair of internal roads within the factory premises was to be re-evaluated based on a newly produced certificate. Additionally, the issue of CENVAT Credit on maintenance and repair of the security vehicle used by the Security Agency within the factory premises required further examination to determine if the service directly related to manufacturing dutiable final products. The Tribunal directed a detailed investigation by the Adjudicating Authority, allowing the appellant an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:01:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 277 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The appellant&#039;s contention for CENVAT Credit on repair of internal roads within the factory premises was to be re-evaluated based on a newly produced certificate. Additionally, the issue of CENVAT Credit on maintenance and repair of the security vehicle used by the Security Agency within the factory premises required further examination to determine if the service directly related to manufacturing dutiable final products. The Tribunal directed a detailed investigation by the Adjudicating Authority, allowing the appellant an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>