https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248363 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to reactivate it promptly, despite multiple opportunities and applications for condonation of delay. The court criticized the appellant's use of RTI applications to seek information, emphasizing the unnecessary delay caused. The duty drawback claim was denied based on the misdeclaration of goods, which the appellant failed to prove. Consequently, the court imposed an exemplary cost of Rs. 50,000 on the appellant for conduct and failure to justify the delay or substantiate the misdeclaration. en-us Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2014 09:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248363 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to reactivate it promptly, despite multiple opportunities and applications for condonation of delay. The court criticized the appellant's use of RTI applications to seek information, emphasizing the unnecessary delay caused. The duty drawback claim was denied based on the misdeclaration of goods, which the appellant failed to prove. Consequently, the court imposed an exemplary cost of Rs. 50,000 on the appellant for conduct and failure to justify the delay or substantiate the misdeclaration. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248363