<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248362</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed on Shri Khem Singh Lalas and Shri Mukhalesh Jain under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of sufficient evidence and procedural lapses in establishing the appellants&#039; involvement in the alleged offense, ultimately leading to the decision to overturn the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 266 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248362</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed on Shri Khem Singh Lalas and Shri Mukhalesh Jain under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of sufficient evidence and procedural lapses in establishing the appellants&#039; involvement in the alleged offense, ultimately leading to the decision to overturn the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>