<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248361</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value for imports from a related foreign principal cannot be rejected merely because comparable third-party import prices are higher. The Customs Valuation Rules require positive evidence that the relationship influenced the price, or that additional consideration flowed back to the supplier. Where the importer supports the invoice price with cost sheets, original invoices and related records showing a cost plus method, and the price comparisons involve different commercial levels and quantities, the declared value remains acceptable. On those facts, valuation enhancement is not justified and the invoice price should be accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 265 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248361</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value for imports from a related foreign principal cannot be rejected merely because comparable third-party import prices are higher. The Customs Valuation Rules require positive evidence that the relationship influenced the price, or that additional consideration flowed back to the supplier. Where the importer supports the invoice price with cost sheets, original invoices and related records showing a cost plus method, and the price comparisons involve different commercial levels and quantities, the declared value remains acceptable. On those facts, valuation enhancement is not justified and the invoice price should be accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>