<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 247 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation and reworking of lease rentals, recognizing the transactions as financial leases. It dismissed the disallowance of prior period expenditure and under section 40(a)(ia), aligning with the assessee&#039;s arguments and legal precedents. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 247 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of depreciation and reworking of lease rentals, recognizing the transactions as financial leases. It dismissed the disallowance of prior period expenditure and under section 40(a)(ia), aligning with the assessee&#039;s arguments and legal precedents. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>