<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 245 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248341</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata confirmed the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act for cash payments exceeding prescribed limits for business purposes, dismissing the appeal. However, the ITAT allowed the entire business expenditure of Rs.80,150 under &#039;Subscription &amp;amp; Donations&#039;, overturning the disallowance of 50%. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and specific conditions under the law, emphasizing that business expediency does not exempt from section 40A(3) provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 245 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248341</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata confirmed the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act for cash payments exceeding prescribed limits for business purposes, dismissing the appeal. However, the ITAT allowed the entire business expenditure of Rs.80,150 under &#039;Subscription &amp;amp; Donations&#039;, overturning the disallowance of 50%. The judgment emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and specific conditions under the law, emphasizing that business expediency does not exempt from section 40A(3) provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>