<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent and Managing Director under the Customs Act, 1962, finding they were not responsible for the actions of their employee beyond his authorized capacity. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying signatory authority on shipping documents and ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting that penalties should only be imposed with clear evidence of wrongdoing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 229 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent and Managing Director under the Customs Act, 1962, finding they were not responsible for the actions of their employee beyond his authorized capacity. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying signatory authority on shipping documents and ruled in favor of the appellants, highlighting that penalties should only be imposed with clear evidence of wrongdoing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>