https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248324 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's condonation of delay application, leading to the appeal's dismissal. The appellant's argument of improper service of the order was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the order was validly served on the director of the appellant firm. Despite citing relevant decisions, the appellant failed to provide a convincing explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, resulting in the Tribunal's decision not to condone the delay. The Tribunal highlighted that service methods under the Customs Act are alternative, and once service is completed, further attempts are unnecessary. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248324 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's condonation of delay application, leading to the appeal's dismissal. The appellant's argument of improper service of the order was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the order was validly served on the director of the appellant firm. Despite citing relevant decisions, the appellant failed to provide a convincing explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, resulting in the Tribunal's decision not to condone the delay. The Tribunal highlighted that service methods under the Customs Act are alternative, and once service is completed, further attempts are unnecessary. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248324