<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248316</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of thoroughly assessing the sources of deposits, especially concerning the withdrawals and redeposits made by the assessee. The decision underscored the significance of providing substantiated explanations for financial transactions to prevent additions under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:02:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 220 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248316</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, stressing the importance of thoroughly assessing the sources of deposits, especially concerning the withdrawals and redeposits made by the assessee. The decision underscored the significance of providing substantiated explanations for financial transactions to prevent additions under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>