<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 216 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248312</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on estimating the assessee&#039;s income, applying an 8% net profit rate, and reducing the disallowed expenses. The Tribunal found the rejection of the books of account justified due to material defects and noted the substantial relief already provided to the assessee. As the revenue did not appeal the relief, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 216 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248312</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on estimating the assessee&#039;s income, applying an 8% net profit rate, and reducing the disallowed expenses. The Tribunal found the rejection of the books of account justified due to material defects and noted the substantial relief already provided to the assessee. As the revenue did not appeal the relief, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>