<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 201 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248297</link>
    <description>Where body-built motor vehicles are manufactured on chassis supplied free of cost by the principal manufacturer and the finished vehicles are first sold through the principal&#039;s depots, valuation is governed by Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, not Rule 6 read with Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The depot sale price used for valuation must be treated as cum-duty price, with embedded duty backed out in computing assessable value. Questions of suppression of facts, extended limitation, and consequential penalty were not finally settled on the existing record and were remanded for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 201 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248297</link>
      <description>Where body-built motor vehicles are manufactured on chassis supplied free of cost by the principal manufacturer and the finished vehicles are first sold through the principal&#039;s depots, valuation is governed by Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, not Rule 6 read with Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The depot sale price used for valuation must be treated as cum-duty price, with embedded duty backed out in computing assessable value. Questions of suppression of facts, extended limitation, and consequential penalty were not finally settled on the existing record and were remanded for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>