https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248296 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash orders disallowing cenvat credit due to a delay of about one and a half years in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Emphasizing the importance of showing "sufficient cause" for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the court found no valid grounds presented for condoning the significant delay. The judgment highlighted the necessity of diligence and compliance with procedural requirements, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition for lack of justification in condoning the delay. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248296 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash orders disallowing cenvat credit due to a delay of about one and a half years in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Emphasizing the importance of showing "sufficient cause" for delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the court found no valid grounds presented for condoning the significant delay. The judgment highlighted the necessity of diligence and compliance with procedural requirements, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the petition for lack of justification in condoning the delay. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248296