<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting permission for re-export of rough diamonds without a Kimberley Process (KP) Certificate in compliance with Board Circular provisions. The penalties imposed under the Customs Act were set aside, following legal precedents and proper documentation, ensuring fair treatment for the appellant in the importation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting permission for re-export of rough diamonds without a Kimberley Process (KP) Certificate in compliance with Board Circular provisions. The penalties imposed under the Customs Act were set aside, following legal precedents and proper documentation, ensuring fair treatment for the appellant in the importation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>