https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248286 The appeal was successful, leading to the majority order being overturned in favor of the minority judgment. The minority judgment was upheld, determining that the Co-ordination Committee's actions did not violate Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002. It was emphasized that the Co-ordination Committee's activities, while potentially misguided, were legitimate trade union activities and did not constitute anti-competitive practices. en-us Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2014 12:46:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248286 The appeal was successful, leading to the majority order being overturned in favor of the minority judgment. The minority judgment was upheld, determining that the Co-ordination Committee's actions did not violate Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002. It was emphasized that the Co-ordination Committee's activities, while potentially misguided, were legitimate trade union activities and did not constitute anti-competitive practices. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248286