<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 177 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order allowing deduction u/s. 80-IB(10) for AY 2009-10 in a case where the Revenue challenged the eligibility due to exceeding commercial area limits and construction of residential units over 1000 sq. ft. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing project approval pre-limitation amendment and no deduction claimed for the relevant project in the current year. The decision aligned with High Court precedents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the deduction based on legal provisions and factual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 11:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 177 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order allowing deduction u/s. 80-IB(10) for AY 2009-10 in a case where the Revenue challenged the eligibility due to exceeding commercial area limits and construction of residential units over 1000 sq. ft. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing project approval pre-limitation amendment and no deduction claimed for the relevant project in the current year. The decision aligned with High Court precedents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the deduction based on legal provisions and factual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>