https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248259 The appellant faced allegations of duty appropriation and discrepancies in stock of finished goods. The court overturned the confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty, ruling in favor of the appellant. Lack of evidence for clandestine activities led to setting aside the demand based on assumptions. The appellant was entitled to a refund of the deposit made under protest. Both appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting the Revenue's claims. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248259 The appellant faced allegations of duty appropriation and discrepancies in stock of finished goods. The court overturned the confirmation of demand, interest, and penalty, ruling in favor of the appellant. Lack of evidence for clandestine activities led to setting aside the demand based on assumptions. The appellant was entitled to a refund of the deposit made under protest. Both appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting the Revenue's claims. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248259