<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 158 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248254</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal to delete the penalty imposed on the respondent under section 112 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the respondent to fraudulent activities, primarily relying on a one-line statement by another individual. Citing a similar case, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent&#039;s involvement was not proven beyond doubt. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating no errors were found, and dismissed the Tax Appeal as no substantial legal questions were raised for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 158 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248254</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal to delete the penalty imposed on the respondent under section 112 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence linking the respondent to fraudulent activities, primarily relying on a one-line statement by another individual. Citing a similar case, the Tribunal concluded that the respondent&#039;s involvement was not proven beyond doubt. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating no errors were found, and dismissed the Tax Appeal as no substantial legal questions were raised for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>