https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248253 The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that it does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the non-renewal of a Customs House Agent (CHA) Licence under Regulation 11 of the CHALR, 2004. The decision was based on the principle established by the Bombay High Court that no appeal lies against an order rejecting the renewal of a CHA licence. The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable, and the parties were advised to seek redressal through an appropriate legal forum. All miscellaneous applications in the case were also disposed of in conjunction with the main appeal. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248253 The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that it does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the non-renewal of a Customs House Agent (CHA) Licence under Regulation 11 of the CHALR, 2004. The decision was based on the principle established by the Bombay High Court that no appeal lies against an order rejecting the renewal of a CHA licence. The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable, and the parties were advised to seek redressal through an appropriate legal forum. All miscellaneous applications in the case were also disposed of in conjunction with the main appeal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248253