<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248238</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment process and consideration of relevant legal precedents. The ITAT criticized the CIT(A) for not entertaining additional claims and remanded both issues for fresh consideration, citing Tribunal decisions supporting the assessee&#039;s position on the mutuality principle and exemption of Transfer Fees and TDR premium.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=357006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248238</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment process and consideration of relevant legal precedents. The ITAT criticized the CIT(A) for not entertaining additional claims and remanded both issues for fresh consideration, citing Tribunal decisions supporting the assessee&#039;s position on the mutuality principle and exemption of Transfer Fees and TDR premium.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>