https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165254 The notification issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh was construed to operate across the entire State, and the reference to Telangana was treated as inadvertent rather than as a territorial restriction. It therefore authorised the relevant Drug Inspectors to act under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, and the complaint was validly instituted. On limitation, Chapter XXXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was held to govern the filing of the complaint and initiation of prosecution, not the date on which the court later takes cognizance. A complaint filed within time is not defeated by judicial delay in passing the cognizance order. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165254 The notification issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh was construed to operate across the entire State, and the reference to Telangana was treated as inadvertent rather than as a territorial restriction. It therefore authorised the relevant Drug Inspectors to act under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, and the complaint was validly instituted. On limitation, Chapter XXXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was held to govern the filing of the complaint and initiation of prosecution, not the date on which the court later takes cognizance. A complaint filed within time is not defeated by judicial delay in passing the cognizance order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165254