https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248225 A writ petition challenging an excise order was held not to be entertainable where the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 provided an efficacious statutory appellate and revisional remedy under Section 9A. The High Court noted that, under Article 226, writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised when an alternative remedy is available, except in exceptional cases. As the petitioner could approach the competent appellate authority and seek redress on the merits, the court declined to invoke writ jurisdiction and left the statutory remedy intact. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248225 A writ petition challenging an excise order was held not to be entertainable where the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 provided an efficacious statutory appellate and revisional remedy under Section 9A. The High Court noted that, under Article 226, writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised when an alternative remedy is available, except in exceptional cases. As the petitioner could approach the competent appellate authority and seek redress on the merits, the court declined to invoke writ jurisdiction and left the statutory remedy intact. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248225