https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248215 In alleged economic offences involving cheating and misappropriation of entrusted funds, anticipatory bail need not be cancelled merely to facilitate recovery, especially where the transaction is old and the amount is said to have been spent. The Delhi HC also indicated that a bail order may be modified if it does not adequately address the alleged misappropriated , and that reasonable monetary conditions can be imposed under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 while granting anticipatory bail. The stated approach seeks to balance personal liberty with the interests of justice in cases involving alleged financial wrongdoing. en-us Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2014 13:18:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248215 In alleged economic offences involving cheating and misappropriation of entrusted funds, anticipatory bail need not be cancelled merely to facilitate recovery, especially where the transaction is old and the amount is said to have been spent. The Delhi HC also indicated that a bail order may be modified if it does not adequately address the alleged misappropriated , and that reasonable monetary conditions can be imposed under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 while granting anticipatory bail. The stated approach seeks to balance personal liberty with the interests of justice in cases involving alleged financial wrongdoing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248215