<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 116 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deductions claimed by a hotel company under sections 80HHD and 80-IB for the assessment year 2000-01. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s argument for deductions based on individual unit performance, ruling that deductions should be determined based on the entire business&#039;s turnover and earnings. The decision was influenced by previous judgments and aligned with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 116 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deductions claimed by a hotel company under sections 80HHD and 80-IB for the assessment year 2000-01. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s argument for deductions based on individual unit performance, ruling that deductions should be determined based on the entire business&#039;s turnover and earnings. The decision was influenced by previous judgments and aligned with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>