<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 115 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248211</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the reversal of the recovered amount, maintaining the bank balance, and ensuring prompt hearing and disposal of stay applications by the Tribunal. The court emphasized the need for fair play and procedural propriety in handling tax recovery proceedings. No order as to costs was made, and the parties were directed to abide by the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:38:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 115 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248211</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the reversal of the recovered amount, maintaining the bank balance, and ensuring prompt hearing and disposal of stay applications by the Tribunal. The court emphasized the need for fair play and procedural propriety in handling tax recovery proceedings. No order as to costs was made, and the parties were directed to abide by the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>