<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 112 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee as the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was deemed invalid due to being a mere change of opinion without new tangible material. Consequently, the reassessment made under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 was canceled. Other issues regarding the apportionment method for overheads and adjustment for raw material transfers were not addressed in detail as a result of the invalid reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 112 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee as the reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was deemed invalid due to being a mere change of opinion without new tangible material. Consequently, the reassessment made under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 was canceled. Other issues regarding the apportionment method for overheads and adjustment for raw material transfers were not addressed in detail as a result of the invalid reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>