https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165252 The court examined challenges to the validity of Acts inserted in the Ninth Schedule after being declared unconstitutional, emphasizing the potential damage to the Constitution's basic structure. It discussed the interpretation of Article 31B and the basic structure doctrine, highlighting concerns about post-Kesavananda Bharti inclusions in the Ninth Schedule. In evaluating the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, the court found Section 27(1) unconstitutional for violating fundamental rights. The judgment underscored the importance of safeguarding citizens' property rights and the need for clarity on the constitutionality of such legislative provisions. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165252 The court examined challenges to the validity of Acts inserted in the Ninth Schedule after being declared unconstitutional, emphasizing the potential damage to the Constitution's basic structure. It discussed the interpretation of Article 31B and the basic structure doctrine, highlighting concerns about post-Kesavananda Bharti inclusions in the Ninth Schedule. In evaluating the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, the court found Section 27(1) unconstitutional for violating fundamental rights. The judgment underscored the importance of safeguarding citizens' property rights and the need for clarity on the constitutionality of such legislative provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165252