<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 110 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing an addition of Rs. 20 lakhs instead of the entire disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The decision highlighted the significance of substance over form in evaluating transactions and stressed the necessity for a practical approach in determining disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 110 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing an addition of Rs. 20 lakhs instead of the entire disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The decision highlighted the significance of substance over form in evaluating transactions and stressed the necessity for a practical approach in determining disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>