https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248187 The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal on the ground of limitation. Emphasizing the need for condonation of delays to ensure justice, the Court held that the delay of 2 months and 19 days was sufficient cause for condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court also ruled that the appeal, signed by a staff member, should not have been dismissed solely on that basis. Consequently, the High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the parties to appear before the Tribunal for the appeal to be heard on its merits. en-us Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248187 The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal on the ground of limitation. Emphasizing the need for condonation of delays to ensure justice, the Court held that the delay of 2 months and 19 days was sufficient cause for condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court also ruled that the appeal, signed by a staff member, should not have been dismissed solely on that basis. Consequently, the High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the parties to appear before the Tribunal for the appeal to be heard on its merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248187