<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 77 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the expenditure on brand label and registration charges as revenue in nature. The expenses for renewing existing brand registrations were deemed recurring and did not create new assets. The Tribunal noted the consistent treatment of such expenses in previous assessments and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision that the expenditure was revenue in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 77 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the expenditure on brand label and registration charges as revenue in nature. The expenses for renewing existing brand registrations were deemed recurring and did not create new assets. The Tribunal noted the consistent treatment of such expenses in previous assessments and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the decision that the expenditure was revenue in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>