https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248159 The Allahabad HC noted that the constitutional challenge to the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 2007 had already been rejected in earlier batch proceedings, including the Article 301 plea, so the Act's validity stood affirmed. Interim orders passed by the Supreme Court in connected special leave petitions were confined to those cases and were not precedents, so they could not justify reopening the same challenge. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable on that basis, and the petitioners were directed to pursue the statutory remedies available against notices and assessment orders under the Act. en-us Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248159 The Allahabad HC noted that the constitutional challenge to the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 2007 had already been rejected in earlier batch proceedings, including the Article 301 plea, so the Act's validity stood affirmed. Interim orders passed by the Supreme Court in connected special leave petitions were confined to those cases and were not precedents, so they could not justify reopening the same challenge. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable on that basis, and the petitioners were directed to pursue the statutory remedies available against notices and assessment orders under the Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248159