<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 61 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal to amend the approved ground plan of Central Excise registration to include pipelines for transportation, emphasizing that areas beyond the factory premises were not considered part of the factory precinct. The decision highlighted the distinction between manufacturing activities and transportation of raw materials, stating that the latter does not necessarily constitute manufacturing for registration purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 61 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal to amend the approved ground plan of Central Excise registration to include pipelines for transportation, emphasizing that areas beyond the factory premises were not considered part of the factory precinct. The decision highlighted the distinction between manufacturing activities and transportation of raw materials, stating that the latter does not necessarily constitute manufacturing for registration purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>