<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 58 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of respondents to avail CENVAT credit for service tax paid on freight for outward transportation. Relying on decisions from the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court and the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, the Tribunal found no flaw in the Commissioner (Appeals) order and upheld it, citing that CENVAT credit is allowable for the relevant period. The appeal was dismissed, providing a clear resolution to the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 58 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the eligibility of respondents to avail CENVAT credit for service tax paid on freight for outward transportation. Relying on decisions from the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court and the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, the Tribunal found no flaw in the Commissioner (Appeals) order and upheld it, citing that CENVAT credit is allowable for the relevant period. The appeal was dismissed, providing a clear resolution to the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>