<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 26 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248122</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the revisional authority&#039;s order and reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to grant rebate claims to the petitioner. The court emphasized that the retrospective amendment to Rule 18 applied to the pending claims due to non-communication of initial rejection orders, justifying the petitioner&#039;s position. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 26 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248122</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the revisional authority&#039;s order and reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision to grant rebate claims to the petitioner. The court emphasized that the retrospective amendment to Rule 18 applied to the pending claims due to non-communication of initial rejection orders, justifying the petitioner&#039;s position. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>