https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165240 Article 22(5) requires the appropriate Government to consider a detenue's representation against preventive detention independently of the Advisory Board's role. That constitutional duty arises as soon as the representation is received and is not limited to representations made before reference to the Board. The Government is not merely a forwarding authority; it must first examine the representation and then place it before the Board for its own consideration. The timing of the representation does not reduce the safeguard, and failure by the Government to consider it vitiates the detention order. en-us Thu, 01 May 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165240 Article 22(5) requires the appropriate Government to consider a detenue's representation against preventive detention independently of the Advisory Board's role. That constitutional duty arises as soon as the representation is received and is not limited to representations made before reference to the Board. The Government is not merely a forwarding authority; it must first examine the representation and then place it before the Board for its own consideration. The timing of the representation does not reduce the safeguard, and failure by the Government to consider it vitiates the detention order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 May 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165240