<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1018 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248091</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on port charges and technical inspection services used in export was found admissible under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. Where the exporter had used the eligible services in the course of export and produced the relevant supporting documents, compliance with the notification conditions was established. On that basis, the denial of refund was not sustained, and the claimant was held entitled to refund with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1018 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248091</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on port charges and technical inspection services used in export was found admissible under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. Where the exporter had used the eligible services in the course of export and produced the relevant supporting documents, compliance with the notification conditions was established. On that basis, the denial of refund was not sustained, and the claimant was held entitled to refund with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>