<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1010 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248083</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application to introduce relevant evidence, acknowledged procedural errors, and set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed, providing relief to the appellant. The tribunal found discrepancies in the calculation of DEPB benefits and procedural lapses in issuing show cause notices, leading to the decision to overturn the penalties and confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1010 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248083</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application to introduce relevant evidence, acknowledged procedural errors, and set aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposed, providing relief to the appellant. The tribunal found discrepancies in the calculation of DEPB benefits and procedural lapses in issuing show cause notices, leading to the decision to overturn the penalties and confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>