https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165234 Protected-tenant status acquired under sections 3 and 3A(1) of the Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939, and recognised in the revenue record, was treated as an accrued right. The landlord did not challenge that status within the statutory time. Section 31 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 continued persons already deemed protected tenants, while section 88 was held to operate prospectively and not to divest vested rights. Section 89(2)(b)(i) preserved accrued rights and section 89(2)(b)(ii) kept pending proceedings alive under the repealed regime. The defendants therefore retained protected-tenant status despite the later exclusion provision. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Aug 2014 21:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165234 Protected-tenant status acquired under sections 3 and 3A(1) of the Bombay Tenancy Act, 1939, and recognised in the revenue record, was treated as an accrued right. The landlord did not challenge that status within the statutory time. Section 31 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 continued persons already deemed protected tenants, while section 88 was held to operate prospectively and not to divest vested rights. Section 89(2)(b)(i) preserved accrued rights and section 89(2)(b)(ii) kept pending proceedings alive under the repealed regime. The defendants therefore retained protected-tenant status despite the later exclusion provision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165234