https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248079 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision to impose penalties on the petitioner for non-disclosure of income, rejecting the plea for penalty reduction. Despite the petitioner's request for rectification, the Commission's decision stood, emphasizing the discretionary nature of interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court highlighted the need for substantial injustice for intervention and dismissed the writ petition, citing the finality of the Commission's orders and lack of equity in the petitioner's favor. en-us Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 May 2014 13:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248079 The Court upheld the Settlement Commission's decision to impose penalties on the petitioner for non-disclosure of income, rejecting the plea for penalty reduction. Despite the petitioner's request for rectification, the Commission's decision stood, emphasizing the discretionary nature of interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court highlighted the need for substantial injustice for intervention and dismissed the writ petition, citing the finality of the Commission's orders and lack of equity in the petitioner's favor. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248079