<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 986 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248059</link>
    <description>Section 73(1)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994 could be invoked only where there was an omission or failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, leading to escaped, under-assessed, short-paid, or non-paid service tax. As the assessee had been registered, filed ST-3 returns, and produced the relevant contracts, bills, and other materials during verification under section 71, the department proceeded on facts already disclosed and failed to establish the necessary non-disclosure of primary facts. The show cause notice and demand were therefore without jurisdiction, and the penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 986 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248059</link>
      <description>Section 73(1)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994 could be invoked only where there was an omission or failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, leading to escaped, under-assessed, short-paid, or non-paid service tax. As the assessee had been registered, filed ST-3 returns, and produced the relevant contracts, bills, and other materials during verification under section 71, the department proceeded on facts already disclosed and failed to establish the necessary non-disclosure of primary facts. The show cause notice and demand were therefore without jurisdiction, and the penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>