<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 979 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248052</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, under the judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa, ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning availing Cenvat credit of service tax based on invoices from a service provider who did not pay the tax. Despite the service provider&#039;s willful suppression and subsequent payment, the appellant was allowed to claim the credit as the relevant rule amendments did not apply to pre-2011 situations. The appellant&#039;s advance payment of service tax to the provider was considered, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit conditions, and the stay petition was granted without duty and penalty requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 12:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 979 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248052</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI, under the judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa, ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning availing Cenvat credit of service tax based on invoices from a service provider who did not pay the tax. Despite the service provider&#039;s willful suppression and subsequent payment, the appellant was allowed to claim the credit as the relevant rule amendments did not apply to pre-2011 situations. The appellant&#039;s advance payment of service tax to the provider was considered, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit conditions, and the stay petition was granted without duty and penalty requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>