<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 978 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original dropping the excise duty demand on the differential value of goods cleared in gunny bags and plastic crates. The exclusion of the cost of durable and returnable packing from the assessable value was deemed in line with Section 4(4)(d) of the Central Excise Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking substance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 978 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original dropping the excise duty demand on the differential value of goods cleared in gunny bags and plastic crates. The exclusion of the cost of durable and returnable packing from the assessable value was deemed in line with Section 4(4)(d) of the Central Excise Act. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking substance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>