https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248049 The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority to redetermine penalties on the appellants, ensuring compliance with the High Court's directions. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 7 lakhs due to the appellant's status as a 100% EOU and the misuse of only 5 out of 29 machines. The Tribunal directed reconsideration of penalties on juristic persons, including Chirag, Chiramith, and Tavadec, emphasizing that penalties on all appellants should be reviewed. The nominal redemption fine on spares was upheld without interference. en-us Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 May 2014 12:10:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248049 The Tribunal remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority to redetermine penalties on the appellants, ensuring compliance with the High Court's directions. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 7 lakhs due to the appellant's status as a 100% EOU and the misuse of only 5 out of 29 machines. The Tribunal directed reconsideration of penalties on juristic persons, including Chirag, Chiramith, and Tavadec, emphasizing that penalties on all appellants should be reviewed. The nominal redemption fine on spares was upheld without interference. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248049